Thermal Remediation - Combined Remedies - Revision history

Admin at 02:39, 28 April 2022

2022-04-28T02:39:13Z

Admin at 02:28, 28 April 2022

2022-04-28T02:28:18Z

Jhurley: /* Introduction */

2020-12-11T17:48:28Z

‎Introduction

Jhurley: /* Introduction */

2020-12-11T17:47:15Z

‎Introduction

Jhurley: /* Introduction */

2020-12-11T17:45:50Z

‎Introduction

Jhurley: /* Case Studies */

2020-12-11T17:08:16Z

‎Case Studies

Jhurley: /* Case Studies */

2020-12-11T16:59:25Z

‎Case Studies

Jhurley: /* Case Studies */

2020-12-11T16:43:03Z

‎Case Studies

Jhurley at 16:05, 11 December 2020

2020-12-11T16:05:13Z

Jhurley at 15:22, 11 December 2020

2020-12-11T15:22:24Z

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 '''Related Article(s)''':
 *[[Thermal Remediation]]
@@ Line 26: / Line 27: @@
 {| class="wikitable" style="float:left; margin-right:15px;text-align:center;"
-|+ Table 1. Technologies applied in the different zones of a complex contaminated site
+|+Table 1. Technologies applied in the different zones of a complex contaminated site
 |-
-! Zone
+!Zone
-! Characteristics
+!Characteristics
-! Technologies
+!Technologies
 |-
-| Source || Large mass, NAPL or strongly adsorbed contaminants.</br>Both vadose zone and aquifer contamination || Thermal (high mass, stringent criteria),</br>ISCO (lower mass), EZVI (modest mass)</br>Soil Vapor extraction used in vadose zone
+|Source||Large mass, NAPL or strongly adsorbed contaminants.<br>Both vadose zone and aquifer contamination||Thermal (high mass, stringent criteria),<br>ISCO (lower mass), EZVI (modest mass)<br>Soil Vapor extraction used in vadose zone
 |-
-| Transition || Intermediate concentrations, modest mass,</br>typically below the water table || ISCO, ISCR, EZVI, thermal if stringent</br>criteria must be met quickly
+|Transition||Intermediate concentrations, modest mass,<br>typically below the water table||ISCO, ISCR, EZVI, thermal if stringent<br>criteria must be met quickly
 |-
-| Plume || Dissolved or adsorbed contamination || Bioremediation, permeable reactivebarriers (PRBs),</br> monitored natural attenuation (MNA)
+|Plume||Dissolved or adsorbed contamination||Bioremediation, permeable reactivebarriers (PRBs),<br> monitored natural attenuation (MNA)
 |}
@@ Line 50: / Line 51: @@
 #'''Endicott, NY:''' A [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrachloroethylene PCE] source zone was removed using [[Thermal Conduction Heating (TCH)]], reducing the source mass discharge by three orders of magnitude. Pump and treat and monitored natural attenuation were used for the plume. Five years after thermal treatment, the plume had shrunk enough that the pump and treat system was shut down<ref name="Heron2016" />.
-#'''Memphis Depot, TN:''' Thermal treatment removed eight source zones from the upper 30 ft of a silty loess formation, while soil vapor extraction was used to remediate the less concentrated zones in between and below the source zones<ref>Heron, G., Parker, K., Galligan, J., and Holmes, T.C., 2009.  Thermal Treatment of 8 CVOC Source Zones to Near Nondetect Concentrations. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation, 29(3), pp. 56-65.  [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01247.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01247.x]&nbsp;&nbsp; [[Media: Heron2009thermalCVOCs.pdf | Open Access Article]]</ref>.
+#'''Memphis Depot, TN:''' Thermal treatment removed eight source zones from the upper 30 ft of a silty loess formation, while soil vapor extraction was used to remediate the less concentrated zones in between and below the source zones<ref>Heron, G., Parker, K., Galligan, J., and Holmes, T.C., 2009.  Thermal Treatment of 8 CVOC Source Zones to Near Nondetect Concentrations. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation, 29(3), pp. 56-65.  [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01247.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01247.x]&nbsp;&nbsp; [//www.enviro.wiki/images/e/e7/Heron2009thermalCVOCs.pdf  Open Access Article]</ref>.
-#'''Fort Lewis, WA:''' Thermal treatment of three source zones followed by low temperature and low energy ERH with ''in situ'' bioremediation in the transition and plume zones<ref name="Truex2007">Truex, M., Powell, T. and Lynch, K., 2007. In Situ Dechlorination of TCH during Aquifer Heating. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 27(2), pp. 96-105. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2007.00141.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2007.00141.x]</ref><ref name="Powell2007">Powell, T., Smith, G., Sturza, J., Lynch, K. and Truex, M., 2007. New Advancements for ''In Situ'' Treatment Using Electrical Resistance Heating. Remediation Journal, 17(2), pp. 51-70. [https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.20124 DOI: 10.1002/rem.20124]&nbsp;&nbsp; Free download from: [https://www.dtsc-ssfl.com/files/lib_ceqa/ref_draft_peir/Chap4_13-EnergyConsump/68457_Wiley_periodicals.pdf California EPA].</ref><ref>Macbeth, T., Truex, M., Powell, T., Michalsen, M., 2012. Final Report: Combining Low-Energy Electrical Resistance Heating with Biotic and Abiotic Reactions for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent DNAPL Source Areas, ESTCP Project ER-200719.  [https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Program-Areas/Environmental-Restoration/Contaminated-Groundwater/Persistent-Contamination/ER-200719 Project Website]&nbsp;&nbsp; [[Media: Macbeth2012 ER-200719-FR.pdf | Report.pdf]]</ref>.
+#'''Fort Lewis, WA:''' Thermal treatment of three source zones followed by low temperature and low energy ERH with ''in situ'' bioremediation in the transition and plume zones<ref name="Truex2007">Truex, M., Powell, T. and Lynch, K., 2007. In Situ Dechlorination of TCH during Aquifer Heating. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 27(2), pp. 96-105. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2007.00141.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2007.00141.x]</ref><ref name="Powell2007">Powell, T., Smith, G., Sturza, J., Lynch, K. and Truex, M., 2007. New Advancements for ''In Situ'' Treatment Using Electrical Resistance Heating. Remediation Journal, 17(2), pp. 51-70. [https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.20124 DOI: 10.1002/rem.20124]&nbsp;&nbsp; Free download from: [https://www.dtsc-ssfl.com/files/lib_ceqa/ref_draft_peir/Chap4_13-EnergyConsump/68457_Wiley_periodicals.pdf California EPA].</ref><ref>Macbeth, T., Truex, M., Powell, T., Michalsen, M., 2012. Final Report: Combining Low-Energy Electrical Resistance Heating with Biotic and Abiotic Reactions for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent DNAPL Source Areas, ESTCP Project ER-200719.  [https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Program-Areas/Environmental-Restoration/Contaminated-Groundwater/Persistent-Contamination/ER-200719 Project Website]&nbsp;&nbsp; [//www.enviro.wiki/images/2/20/Macbeth2012_ER-200719-FR.pdf  Report.pdf]</ref>.
 ==Summary==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, 28 April 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:


−	'''~~CONTRIBUTOR~~(S):''' [[Dr. Gorm Heron]]	+	'''Contributor(s):''' [[Dr. Gorm Heron]]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 #'''A dissolved plume''' where contaminants of concern (COCs) exist in dissolved or adsorbed phases. Often, the plume is affected by lower permeability layers, where the COCs have diffused in over time and can become a long-term source as the chemicals diffuse back out because concentration gradients are reversed during remediation.
-{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left:15px;text-align:center;"
+{| class="wikitable" style="float:left; margin-right:15px;text-align:center;"
 |+ Table 1. Technologies applied in the different zones of a complex contaminated site
 |-

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 #'''A transition zone''' where some [[wikipedia:Non-aqueous_phase_liquid|NAPL]] may exist in small stringers, ganglia or droplets, but where the mass is smaller and concentrations lower. In some instances this is referred to as a dilute source or the plume core.
 #'''A dissolved plume''' where contaminants of concern (COCs) exist in dissolved or adsorbed phases. Often, the plume is affected by lower permeability layers, where the COCs have diffused in over time and can become a long-term source as the chemicals diffuse back out because concentration gradients are reversed during remediation.
 {| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left:15px;text-align:center;"
@@ Line 41: / Line 39: @@
 |}
 These technologies must be combined based on site-specific characteristics, remedial objectives, and the capabilities of each technology. One example of a combined remedy is when thermal treatment is used to reduce the source concentration/mass, and a set of permeable reactive barriers are used to control and remediate the plume in the years following thermal treatment (Figure 2). Another example is thermal treatment of the source zone combined with bioremediation of the transition zone and dissolved plume (Figure 3).

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 For successful remediation, it is crucial that every site is well understood and that a good site conceptual model (CSM) is developed. A good CSM is the basis for selecting remedial technologies that are effective in each of the zones. In source zones, technologies must often be effective both above and below the water table. The specific physical characteristics of the contaminants of concern and of the soils must also be considered in selecting the optimal remedy<ref>Davis, E.L., 1997. How Heat Can Accelerate In-situ Soil and Aquifer Remediation: Important Chemical Properties and Guidance on Choosing the Appropriate Technique. US EPA Ground Water Issue Paper EPA/540/S-97/502. [//www.enviro.wiki/images/5/5d/Davis-1997-How_Heat_can_Accelarate_In-Situ_Soil_and_Aqufier_Remediation.pdf Report.pdf]</ref>. Several commonly applied technologies for the three different zones are shown in Table 1.
-[[File:Heron Combined therm Table 1.PNG|650px |left|thumbnail| Table 1.  Technologies applied in the different zones of a complex contaminated site.]]
 These technologies must be combined based on site-specific characteristics, remedial objectives, and the capabilities of each technology. One example of a combined remedy is when thermal treatment is used to reduce the source concentration/mass, and a set of permeable reactive barriers are used to control and remediate the plume in the years following thermal treatment (Figure 2). Another example is thermal treatment of the source zone combined with bioremediation of the transition zone and dissolved plume (Figure 3).

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 #'''Endicott, NY:''' A [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrachloroethylene PCE] source zone was removed using [[Thermal Conduction Heating (TCH)]], reducing the source mass discharge by three orders of magnitude. Pump and treat and monitored natural attenuation were used for the plume. Five years after thermal treatment, the plume had shrunk enough that the pump and treat system was shut down<ref name="Heron2016" />.
-#'''Memphis Depot, TN:''' Thermal treatment removed eight source zones from the upper 30 ft of a silty loess formation, while soil vapor extraction was used to remediate the less concentrated zones in between and below the source zones<ref>Heron, G., Parker, K., Galligan, J. and Holmes, T.C., 2009. Thermal treatment of eight CVOC source zones to near nondetect concentrations. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 29(3), 56-65. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01247.x doi:10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01247.x]</ref>.
+#'''Memphis Depot, TN:''' Thermal treatment removed eight source zones from the upper 30 ft of a silty loess formation, while soil vapor extraction was used to remediate the less concentrated zones in between and below the source zones<ref>Heron, G., Parker, K., Galligan, J., and Holmes, T.C., 2009.  Thermal Treatment of 8 CVOC Source Zones to Near Nondetect Concentrations. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation, 29(3), pp. 56-65.  [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01247.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01247.x]&nbsp;&nbsp; [[Media: Heron2009thermalCVOCs.pdf | Open Access Article]]</ref>.
 #'''Fort Lewis, WA:''' Thermal treatment of three source zones followed by low temperature and energy ERH with ''in situ'' bioremediation in the transition and plume zones<ref name="Truex2007">Truex, M., Powell, T. and Lynch, K., 2007. In Situ Dechlorination of TCH during Aquifer Heating. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 27(2), pp. 96-105. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2007.00141.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2007.00141.x]</ref><ref name="Powell2007">Powell, T., Smith, G., Sturza, J., Lynch, K. and Truex, M., 2007. New Advancements for ''In Situ'' Treatment Using Electrical Resistance Heating. Remediation Journal, 17(2), pp. 51-70. [https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.20124 DOI: 10.1002/rem.20124]&nbsp;&nbsp; Free download from: [https://www.dtsc-ssfl.com/files/lib_ceqa/ref_draft_peir/Chap4_13-EnergyConsump/68457_Wiley_periodicals.pdf California EPA].</ref><ref>Macbeth, T., Truex, M., Powell, T., Michalsen, M., 2012. Final Report: Combining Low-Energy Electrical Resistance Heating with Biotic and Abiotic Reactions for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent DNAPL Source Areas, ESTCP Project ER-200719.  [https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Program-Areas/Environmental-Restoration/Contaminated-Groundwater/Persistent-Contamination/ER-200719 Project Website]&nbsp;&nbsp; [[Media: Macbeth2012 ER-200719-FR.pdf | Report.pdf]]</ref>.

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ==Introduction==
-[[File:Heron Combined therm Fig1.PNG|550px|thumbnail|right|Figure 1. Conceptual model of a complex site with multiple zones with different levels of contamination. ]]
+[[File:Heron Combined therm Fig1.PNG|550px|thumbnail|right| Figure 1. Conceptual model of a complex site with multiple zones with different levels of contamination. ]]
 Most complex sites can be divided into three zones (Figure 1):
 #'''A source zone''' where higher concentrations exist – typically in the form of [[wikipedia:Non-aqueous_phase_liquid|non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs)]] or strongly sorbed contaminants. Note that source zones often have a component above the water table (in the vadose zone) and below the water table (in the aquifer).
 #'''A transition zone''' where some [[wikipedia:Non-aqueous_phase_liquid|NAPL]] may exist in small stringers, ganglia or droplets, but where the mass is smaller and concentrations lower. In some instances this is referred to as a dilute source or the plume core.
-#'''A dissolved plume''' where contaminants of concern (COCs) exist in dissolved or adsorbed phases. Often, the plume is affected by lower permeability layers, where the COCs have diffused in and will provide a long-term source as the chemicals diffuse back out because concentration gradients are reversed during remediation.
+#'''A dissolved plume''' where contaminants of concern (COCs) exist in dissolved or adsorbed phases. Often, the plume is affected by lower permeability layers, where the COCs have diffused in over time and can become a long-term source as the chemicals diffuse back out because concentration gradients are reversed during remediation.
 For successful remediation, it is crucial that every site is well understood and that a good site conceptual model (CSM) is developed. A good CSM is the basis for selecting remedial technologies that are effective in each of the zones. In source zones, technologies must often be effective both above and below the water table. The specific physical characteristics of the contaminants of concern and of the soils must also be considered in selecting the optimal remedy<ref>Davis, E.L., 1997. How Heat Can Accelerate In-situ Soil and Aquifer Remediation: Important Chemical Properties and Guidance on Choosing the Appropriate Technique. US EPA Ground Water Issue Paper EPA/540/S-97/502. [//www.enviro.wiki/images/5/5d/Davis-1997-How_Heat_can_Accelarate_In-Situ_Soil_and_Aqufier_Remediation.pdf Report.pdf]</ref>. Several commonly applied technologies for the three different zones are shown in Table 1.
-[[File:Heron Combined therm Table 1.PNG|650px|thumbnail|Table 1.  Technologies applied in the different zones of a complex contaminated site.]]
+[[File:Heron Combined therm Table 1.PNG|650px |left|thumbnail| Table 1.  Technologies applied in the different zones of a complex contaminated site.]]
 These technologies must be combined based on site-specific characteristics, remedial objectives, and the capabilities of each technology. One example of a combined remedy is when thermal treatment is used to reduce the source concentration/mass, and a set of permeable reactive barriers are used to control and remediate the plume in the years following thermal treatment (Figure 2). Another example is thermal treatment of the source zone combined with bioremediation of the transition zone and dissolved plume (Figure 3).
@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 Recent examples of combined remedies with a thermal component include:
-#'''Endicott, NY:''' A PCE source zone was removed using In Situ Thermal Desorption, reducing the source mass discharge by three orders of magnitude. Pump and treat and monitored natural attenuation was used for the plume. Five years after thermal treatment, the plume shrank and the pump and treat system was shut down<ref name="Heron2016" />.
+#'''Endicott, NY:''' A [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrachloroethylene PCE] source zone was removed using [[Thermal Conduction Heating (TCH)]], reducing the source mass discharge by three orders of magnitude. Pump and treat and monitored natural attenuation was used for the plume. Five years after thermal treatment, the plume shrank and the pump and treat system was shut down<ref name="Heron2016" />.
 #'''Memphis Depot, TN:''' Thermal treatment removed eight source zones from the upper 30 ft of a silty loess formation, while soil vapor extraction was used to remediate the less concentrated zones in between and below the source zones<ref>Heron, G., Parker, K., Galligan, J. and Holmes, T.C., 2009. Thermal treatment of eight CVOC source zones to near nondetect concentrations. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 29(3), 56-65. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01247.x doi:10.1111/j.1745-6592.2009.01247.x]</ref>.
-#'''Fort Lewis, WA:''' Thermal treatment of three source zones followed by low temperature and energy ERH with in situ bioremediation in the transition and plume zones.
+#'''Fort Lewis, WA:''' Thermal treatment of three source zones followed by low temperature and energy ERH with ''in situ'' bioremediation in the transition and plume zones.
 ==Summary==
-Thermal technologies can be coupled with less intensive solutions to provide integrated solutions for complex sites. By treating the source zones thermally, most of the chemical mass is removed. This facilitates treating the transition zone and the plume effectively. Thermal treatment is most often combined with soil vapor extraction and enhanced bioremediation, but site-specific analyses must be used to determine the best options for each site.
+Thermal technologies can be coupled with less intensive solutions to provide integrated solutions for complex sites. By treating the source zones thermally, most of the chemical mass may be removed. This facilitates treating the transition zone and the plume effectively. Thermal treatment is most often combined with soil vapor extraction and enhanced bioremediation, but site-specific analyses must be used to determine the best options for each site.
 ==References==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Complex sites often require a combination of technologies for complete remediation. At heavily contaminated sites, ''in situ'' thermal treatment may be used to treat the source, while other technologies are used in the transition and plume zones. The three major [[Thermal Remediation | Thermal Remediation]] (ISTR) technologies are [[Thermal Remediation - Steam]] (SEE), [[Thermal Remediation - Electrical Resistance Heating]] (ERH), and [[Thermal Remediation - Desorption]]<ref>Davis, E.L., 1997. How Heat Can Accelerate In-situ Soil and Aquifer Remediation: Important Chemical Properties and Guidance on Choosing the Appropriate Technique. US EPA Ground Water Issue Paper EPA/540/S-97/502. [//www.enviro.wiki/images/5/5d/Davis-1997-How_Heat_can_Accelarate_In-Situ_Soil_and_Aqufier_Remediation.pdf Report.pdf]</ref>. These technologies can be combined with [[Chemical Oxidation (In Situ - ISCO) | ''in situ'' chemical oxidation]], [[Chemical Reduction (In Situ - ISCR) | ''in situ'' chemical reduction]], bioremediation, permeable reactive barriers, and [[Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) | monitored natural attenuation]] to provide complete site solutions. They may be enhanced using hydraulic or pneumatic fracturing and emplacement of permeable materials.
+Complex sites often require a combination of technologies for complete remediation. At heavily contaminated sites, ''in situ'' thermal treatment may be used to treat the source, while other technologies are used in the transition and plume zones. The three major [[Thermal Remediation | ''in situ'' thermal remediation]] (ISTR) technologies are [[Thermal Remediation - Steam | Steam Enhanced Extraction (SEE)]], [[Thermal Remediation - Electrical Resistance Heating | Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH)]], and [[Thermal Conduction Heating (TCH)]]. These technologies can be combined with [[Chemical Oxidation (In Situ - ISCO) | ''in situ'' chemical oxidation]], [[Chemical Reduction (In Situ - ISCR) | ''in situ'' chemical reduction]], bioremediation, permeable reactive barriers, and [[Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) | monitored natural attenuation]] to provide complete site solutions. They may be enhanced using hydraulic or pneumatic fracturing and emplacement of permeable materials.
 <div style="float:right;margin:0 0 2em 2em;">__TOC__</div>
@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 #'''A dissolved plume''' where contaminants of concern (COCs) exist in dissolved or adsorbed phases. Often, the plume is affected by lower permeability layers, where the COCs have diffused in and will provide a long-term source as the chemicals diffuse back out because concentration gradients are reversed during remediation.
-For successful remediation, it is crucial that every site is well understood and that a good site conceptual model (CSM) is developed. A good CSM is the basis for selecting remedial technologies that are effective in each of the zones. In source zones, technologies must often be effective both above and below the water table. There are several commonly applied technologies for the three different zones (Table 1).
+For successful remediation, it is crucial that every site is well understood and that a good site conceptual model (CSM) is developed. A good CSM is the basis for selecting remedial technologies that are effective in each of the zones. In source zones, technologies must often be effective both above and below the water table. The specific physical characteristics of the contaminants of concern and of the soils must also be considered in selecting the optimal remedy<ref>Davis, E.L., 1997. How Heat Can Accelerate In-situ Soil and Aquifer Remediation: Important Chemical Properties and Guidance on Choosing the Appropriate Technique. US EPA Ground Water Issue Paper EPA/540/S-97/502. [//www.enviro.wiki/images/5/5d/Davis-1997-How_Heat_can_Accelarate_In-Situ_Soil_and_Aqufier_Remediation.pdf Report.pdf]</ref>. Several commonly applied technologies for the three different zones are shown in Table 1.
-[[File:Heron Combined therm Table 1.PNG|650px|thumbnail|center|Table 1.  Technologies applied in the different zones of a complex contaminated site.]]
+[[File:Heron Combined therm Table 1.PNG|650px|thumbnail|Table 1.  Technologies applied in the different zones of a complex contaminated site.]]
-These technologies must be combined based on site-specific characteristics, remedial objectives, and the capabilities of each technology. One example of a combined remedy is when thermal treatment is used to reduce the source concentration/mass, and a set of permeable reactive barriers are used to control and remediate the plume in the years following thermal treatment (Fig. 2). Another example is thermal treatment of the source zone combined with bioremediation of the transition zone and dissolved plume (Fig. 3).
+These technologies must be combined based on site-specific characteristics, remedial objectives, and the capabilities of each technology. One example of a combined remedy is when thermal treatment is used to reduce the source concentration/mass, and a set of permeable reactive barriers are used to control and remediate the plume in the years following thermal treatment (Figure 2). Another example is thermal treatment of the source zone combined with bioremediation of the transition zone and dissolved plume (Figure 3).
-[[File:Heron Combined Therm Fig2.jpg|thumbnail|450 px|center|Figure 2. Example combined remedy. Thermal treatment of the source zone combined with permeable reactive barriers for treating a long dissolved plume. Thermal source treatment is implemented in the first year, followed by plume treatment in a period afterwards.]]
+[[File:Heron Combined Therm Fig2.jpg|thumbnail|450 px| left | Figure 2. Example combined remedy: Thermal treatment of the source zone combined with permeable reactive barriers for treating a long dissolved plume. Thermal source treatment is implemented in the first year, followed by plume treatment.]]
-[[File:Heron Combined Therm Fig3.jpg|thumbnail|450 px|center|Figure 3. Example combined remedy: Thermal treatment of the source zone combined with bioremediation for treating the transition zone and dissolved plume. Red dots = heaters, green dots = bioremediation injection or extraction wells.]]
+[[File:Heron Combined Therm Fig3.jpg|thumbnail|450 px| Figure 3. Example combined remedy: Thermal treatment of the source zone combined with bioremediation for treating the transition zone and dissolved plume. Red dots = heaters, green dots = bioremediation injection or extraction wells.]]
 ==Case Studies==